今天的四级考试再次考查了论说文写作，难度不是很大。沿袭了几年以来考评学生对与民生息息相关的大众话题的看法。写作提纲也还像以往一样，先阐述社会现象，在谈出社会上存在的一种或几种相同或不同看法之后，然后在最后总结并给出自己的观点，要求论据充分。所以，只要大家考前认真按要求准备，应该可以轻松应对。

　　继去年12月四级写作题目Limiting The Use of Disposable Plastic Bags（1.一次性塑料袋曾被广泛的使用；2.造成的问题；3.限制使用的意义）的“限制一次性塑料袋的使用”后，这次四级写作再次秉承了一个社会讨论的热门话题，即“图书馆是否应该免费向公众开放”，考查了一个对于学生而言既关乎自己又关乎百姓的话题，而且本话题在新闻报纸网络等多家媒体都多方讨论过，这也考查了一下学生对社会事件的关注程度。同时，也提醒了广大考生在准备考试时不仅需要扎扎实实提高语言实力，也不能忽略对周围事物的关注。作为一名新时代的大学生应该担负起社会责任。这样一个课题不仅仅是大学德育教育的工作重心，也会成为我们专业、非专业学习的一个焦点。

　　四级考试一般都是三点提纲，应该严格按照提纲写成三段，每点提纲展开后各写一段，顺序最好不要打乱。今年第一段是写出最新被公众关注的一个热门话题：图书馆是否应该免费对公众开放。也是一个现象作文，先描述现象的产生和具体表现；第二段是否定观点，有些人反对，及其反对的理由观点，此处当然也可以列出赞许的态度及观点；最后一段是我的观点。前两段是现象描述和他人观点陈述段，基本都会陈述两种对立的观点；最后一段进行归纳结论。说明自己是支持还是反对这种做法。一定要注意，与以往相同的是：观点应该鲜明、明确，绝不可模棱两可，两个都满意，或两个都不对。如若那样，本文将成为一篇无论点的议论文，议论文的宗旨也就失去了。

　　值得注意的是，今年的四级写作提纲与近几年看起来似乎不尽相同。最近四年的提纲作文第一段多是现象说明，第二段原因列举，第三段建议措施或利弊说明。今天的考题提纲看起来像是打破了这一“正反对比＋归纳结论”的传统形式，但如果仔细分析梳理会发现，第二段的否定观点和第一段的免费开放的这一现象实质还是一对正反对比的观点，最后一段所谓的自己是观点，也就是在正和反中间做出选择并加以评论，可以说今年四级的写作提纲与近几年的几乎完全一致。这说明四级写作出题还是一直遵循着模板化的倾向。同时，考生需要脚踏实地提高写作水平，此外还要关注社会问题，每点提纲应该给出自己的原因或用自己的语言举例论证，切忌泛泛而谈，与别人一个口气。

　　参考范文

　　Free Admission to Museums

　　Recently, free admissions to museums have aroused extensive public attention as well as hot debates and there are quite a lot of people against this idea. Personally speaking, I firmly believe that it is still not the right time for our country to offer free admissions to museums.

　　Firstly, with such a big population we Chinese are sharing relatively limited resources, museums included. Obviously, free admissions will put even greater pressure on that, which will possibly lead to dilemma: either set extra restriction to visits, which goes opposite to admissions free of charge, or severely shorten the life length of the museum resources because of the visit boom.

　　Secondly, despite the state aid from our government as compensation for the loss of ticket income, almost all the museums are still facing huge financing gap in operation and reservation. Meanwhile, the visit boom has posed a real challenge in managing level.

　　Last but not least, the majority of our population has not formed cultural habit of paying regular visits to museums. The boom mostly reflects many people's enthusiasm on the free admissions but the museums themselves. We've still got a long way to go before we could enlighten proper public awareness of our museum resources.

　　In summary, we may follow the western pattern of free admission, which allows part of the population such as children or the elderly to enjoy the preferential treatment as a slow release of our boom pressure; we may also turn to commonweal organizations and the public for help on the financial challenge besides the government support. We could at the mean time develop diverse function of our museums and further the ethnical education of our population as indirect protection for our invaluable museums resources. But before we could find a better way to solve problems ahead, we should take the step of full scale free admissions.